Hooray For Me!

A Friendly Rant From Captain Spaulding

 

O CANADA! WHO STANDS ON GUARD FOR THEE?

Good fences make good neighbors, wrote Robert Frost. It was a fine poem, but he was dead wrong. The best of neighbors can hardly tell where the yard of one begins and the yard of the other ends.

Canada is the perfect neighbor. With them we share the world's largest undefended border--longest both in terms of geography and endurance.

Canada is polite, tidy, generous, and friendly. If they are occasionally a bit put out by the brawling and boisterous colossus to the south, they don't make too much of a fuss about it.

Canada is also in danger of not being Canada too much longer.

You'd never know that by the American media or everyday conversation stateside. Americans are world-renowned for their total indifference to politics beyond their borders, but Canada is a particularly tragic subject for our collective neglect. When the United States sneezes the rest of the hemisphere catches the flu, but you'd think that Canada's bout with cancer would at least cause our collective brow to furrow.

But the neighbors who draw your attention are the ones who annoy and/or fascinate you. You aren't likely to pay much notice to the people on one side with the immaculate rosebushes and the bright children who make sure their lawn gets mowed every week. You're probably preoccupied with the neighbors on the other side who are always throwing wild parties and midnight shouting matches and leaving their stuff in your yard--the exotic and strange folks who are either having more fun than you or are more miserable than you...or possibly both.

When the tidy neighbor with the rosebushes gets a divorce, you stand out in the street with your other neighbors and say, "Who knew?"

About this divorce...for those of you who really don't get out much, Canada is in essence two nations held together within one country. One nation, like ours, speaks English and is the colonial daughter of Great Britain (although they inherited more of Mum's wardrobe than we did).

The smaller nation speaks French and is descended from the Gallic outpost called Quebec which was conquered in the mid-eighteenth century by Britain and subsequently subsumed into the fledgling Dominion of Canada.

The Quebecois have the classic Francophonic phobia of English-speaking peoples, with the twist that they have been ruled by an English-speaking people for two centuries now. The smoldering resentment that has grown from that situation has led them to increasingly agitate for (by turns) autonomy, recognition as a distinct and equal society, and independence.

With each concession they have wrung from the magnanimous and irenic Canadian government comes more of a counter-resentment from the English-speaking majority outside the borders of Quebec--especially those forced to deal with a bilingual country thousands of miles from any sizeable population of Francophones.

Slowly, inexorably, the two nations grow apart. Quebec has had three referenda on independence, each one coming closer to a majority. In the last referendum, held last year, the French-speaking majority voted for the Bloc Quebecois party and their platform of secession. Only the monolithic "no" vote of the English-speaking minority of southern and western Quebec saved the day for Canada. The Bloc has vowed to stage another referendum within the next few years, and it is problematic whether the country will survive another one. This is because the exodus of Anglophones continues apace from Quebec; hemmed in by the animosity of the Francophonic majority and the oppressive language laws designed to promote French, English-speaking Quebeckers continue to leave the province--reducing their ability to veto secession at the ballot box.

Making things worse is the fact that the country is politically truncated. There is only one national political party, the Liberals (who are currently in power in Parliament). Every other party is a regional one; in the poverty-stricken Maritime provinces along the Atlantic coast, the vote is divided between the Liberals and the left-leaning New Democratic and Progressive Conservative parties; Quebec has a Bloc Quebecois majority and a Liberal minority; Ontario, Canada's industrial heartland and by far the most populous of the Anglophonic provinces, is totally in the hands of the Liberal party; and the western provinces are dominated by the Canadian version of the Republican Party, the free-trade and devolutionistic Reform Party. The latter preys on the fact that westerners resent the domination of Canadian political life by gargantuan, big-government-minded Ontario.

The country cannot survive regional fracturing, but such fracturing seems both inevitable and irreparable at this point. While there are regional political distinctives in the United States--clearly, voting patterns and sensibilities are far different in the American South than they are in the Northeast--the situation is exacerbated in Canada, where nearly everyone in the country lives within 200 miles of the American border. That leaves a thin, narrow stretch of populated country where people are much more likely to have an affinity for the lifestyle of folks just across the border than they are for their countrymen thousands of miles to the east or west. The entrepreneurial, ecological, independent-minded residents of Vancouver are recognizable to Seattleites, while the statist, union-strong Rust Belters of the Ontario factory towns bear a close resemblance to the urban ethnics of Detroit and Buffalo across the rivers. But neither Vancouver nor Windsor sees much resemblance anymore in each other.

The favorite pastime of Canadians (apart from hockey, that is) has always been a sort of low-key griping about the United States and its callous insensitivity to Canada. It was usually well-deserved. The fact that we laughed it off, when we noticed it at all, says much about our attitude towards Canadians--they are so much like us culturally that it is sometimes hard for us to tell the difference between them and us. To assert their own identity, Canadians have become masters of cultural hairsplitting and a rather ineffective self-promotion. They don't like the idea of being our little brother, but our cultural and economic bear-hug is really just our way of showing them how much we like them. We like them because we see them as part of the family.

But conversations with Canadians nowadays show less of that sensible Canadian nature and more of a rather jittery and paranoid streak easily explained by their national crisis. An offhand statement of macho bluster by Bill Clinton about a fishing dispute off the British Columbia coast becomes a national call to arms in Canada as they see a distinct military threat by the current administration in Washington (as if any American would take seriously a president's saber-rattling in the direction of Canada). And there are dark hints about American lobbyist/saboteurs who issue threats in the corridors of power in Ottawa to make members of Parliament vote Washington's way. All of this would be laughable if the mood wasn't so bad in the Great White North.

Perhaps it is time for Americans to take more than passing notice of Canada and its current crisis. Good neighbors remain good neighbors only as long as their house is in order. And you don't know what you have in a good neighbor until he's gone.

E-Mail Captain Spaulding.

Previous Mountaintop Experiences with Captain Spaulding:

Hooray For Me #1-- One Margarita Too Many?

Hooray For Me #2-- Spitting at the Generations

Hooray For Me #3-- The One-Eyed Spokesmodel

Hooray For Me #4-- Semisardonic Over Semisonic

Hooray For Me #5-- Bury My Brain at Wounded Knee

Hooray For Me #6-- Tempest in a B-Cup

Hooray For Me #7-- Princess Diana

Hooray For Me #8-- Get Back, Honky Cat

Hooray For Me #9-- Mother Teresa

Hooray For Me #10-- Selling Johnny Cash

Hooray For Me #11-- Is the Male Ego a Hairy Beast?

Hooray For Me #12-- Why America Gets No Kicks

 


LinkExchange Network